![]() You will see that the examples of each type are all from identical dies or transfer dies, with a little extra "enhancement" such as nicks, cracks, extra patina etc. I hope that the following images, kindly provided by Marcus of and Forum Ancient Coins, will avoid yet more people being cheated. The coins are very well made, struck (not cast) and have fooled not only the casual buyer on auction websites and coin shop websites, but even experienced dealers. All rights reserved.There has been a massive number of fake coins from Serbia circulating since early July 2009. ™ & © 2022 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Thanks to their research, they came to the conclusion that the coins do not come from the Roman Empire, as it has been thought so far, but were faked.Such information has been provided by the First News magazine on its website. Most Antiquities Sold Online Are Fake or Illegal Social media and ISIS have combined to flood the web with thousands of questionable artifacts Jason Daley Correspondent NovemWikimedia. We also like to point out fake coin offers on ebay. “For understanding the dying days of Roman power in the Province of Dacia, and the history of Romania, he is potentially more significant, but our results have just been published and the academic debate is just beginning.” Archaeologists from Warsaw University have analyzed Roman coins found in Poland, Ukraine and Belarus. We want to offer a discussion platform about suspected forgeries, authenticity questions and tooling. ![]() He said that the researchers wanted to start a conversation with Roman historians and archaeologists to try and test their hypothesis about Sponsian. Pearson, however, insisted the researchers had reached “a clear-cut conclusion” about the authenticity of the coins, telling CNN in an email: “For the grand history of Rome, Sponsian is little more than a historical footnote – but a footnote that should nevertheless be reinstated!” “This whole theory - that the coin is genuine - is both unscientific and unfounded,” he added.ĭame Mary Beard, the acclaimed scholar of Ancient Rome and professor of classics at Cambridge University, wrote in a blog post published by the Times Literary Supplement that “there is still very powerful evidence that they are fakes,” going on to list a number of issues surrounding their crafting and design. “Like everyone in the numismatic world, I strongly believe this coin to be a modern forgery,” Jerome Mairat, curator of the Heberden Coin Room in the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, England, told CNN. Disregarded as ‘fakes’ for decades, new analysis of coins bearing the face of a mysterious emperor is providing answers about a heady gap in Roman history. The researchers added that while “nothing can be known about him for certain,” the coins analyzed “provide clues as to his possible place in history.”ĭespite the study’s findings, some experts, including in the field of numismatics - the study or collection of currency - still believe the coin to be fake. The Sponsian coinage series was used to pay senior soldiers and officials, who kept them as a store of wealth, proposed the researchers.įrom the findings, it “would appear to be that Sponsian should be rehabilitated as a historical personage,” the study concluded. Sponsian never controlled an official mint or ruled Rome, said the researchers, but possibly became a local commander-in-chief who took charge during a period of chaos and civil war to protect the population of Dacia. The province of Dacia, which was cut off from the rest of the Roman empire in around 260 AD, was a region prized for its gold mines and mineral resources, according to UCL.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |